Bigger is not always better for machine learning. Yet, deep learning models and the datasets on which they're trained keep expanding, as researchers race to outdo one another while chasing state-of-the-art benchmarks. However groundbreaking they are, the consequences of bigger models are severe for both budgets and the environment alike. For example, GPT-3, this summer's massive, buzzworthy model for natural language processing, reportedly cost $12 million to train. What's worse, UMass Amherst researchers found that the computing power required to train a large AI model can produce over 600,000 pounds of CO2 emissions – that's five times the amount of the typical car over its lifespan.

Bigger is not always better for machine learning. Yet, deep learning models and the datasets on which they're trained keep expanding, as researchers race to outdo one another while chasing state-of-the-art benchmarks. However groundbreaking they are, the consequences of bigger models are severe for both budgets and the environment alike. For example, GPT-3, this summer's massive, buzzworthy model for natural language processing, reportedly cost $12 million to train. What's worse, UMass Amherst researchers found that the computing power required to train a large AI model can produce over 600,000 pounds of CO2 emissions – that's five times the amount of the typical car over its lifespan.